Commonwealth Games 2026 Medal Tally: India Finish 4th With 39 Medals

Every four years the same thing happens. India wins something, a screenshot of a medal table goes around, and half the replies are arguing that the table is wrong because a country with fewer medals is sitting higher up. It isn’t wrong. The table is doing exactly what it is designed to do, and once you understand the sort order, the whole thing stops being confusing.

This is the reference page from the Dhani Win team for the 2026 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow: the final table, how it is ranked, how ties are broken, why different websites showed different numbers during the Games, and what the unusually compact Glasgow programme meant for India. What you will not find here is a predicted finish, odds, or anything resembling a betting tip. We do not publish those.

When we first published this page on 27 July the Games were still running, so we deliberately carried no counts and no placings — a number frozen mid-competition is worse than none at all. The Games have now closed and the table is settled, so the figures below are final rather than provisional. They are reproduced from the published record, not scraped live.

Final Glasgow 2026 Medal Table

The Games ran from 23 July to 2 August 2026, with 215 medal events across ten sports and sixteen disciplines. Australia finished clear at the top. India ended 4th.

Final standings, top six. Full table published by Commonwealth Sport.

Rows 4 and 5 are the cleanest illustration of the sort rule you will ever get. India and Scotland both finished on 13 golds. India placed above Scotland on the silver tie-break — 17 to 8 — even though the two nations were separated by a single medal in total (39 to 38). Had the table been sorted by total medals, as some broadcast graphics quietly do, the order would have looked much the same here; but had Scotland won two more bronzes it would have led India on totals while still sitting below on the official board. That gap between the two ways of counting is the single most common source of medal-table arguments.

Where India’s 39 medals came from

Boxing carried the gold count almost single-handedly: seven of India’s thirteen golds came from the ring, including Sakshi Chaudhary at 51kg, Preeti Panwar at 54kg, Jaismine Lamboria at 57kg, Priya Ghanghas at 60kg, Arundhati Choudhary at 70kg, Sachin Siwach at 60kg and Ankush Panghal at 80kg. Athletics returned the largest haul by volume at sixteen medals but converted far fewer of them to gold, with Soman Rana (shot put F57), Dilip Gavit (100m T47) and Sharmila Dhankar (shot put F57) taking the golds. Mirabai Chanu won India’s only weightlifting gold at 48kg. Neeraj Chopra took silver in the javelin, and Gulveer Singh medalled twice on the track — silver over 10,000m and bronze over 5,000m.

Read that boxing row next to the weightlifting row and the gold-first rule stops being abstract. Weightlifting produced eight medals to boxing’s ten, but boxing produced seven golds to weightlifting’s one. On the official board those two sports are not close, despite the totals being within two of each other.

The Gold-First Rule, Explained Properly

The Commonwealth Games medal table — like the Olympic one — uses what statisticians call a lexicographic sort. In plain language, the sorting happens in strict priority order:

1. Gold medals, highest first. Nothing else is looked at until this is settled.
2. Silver medals, used only to separate nations level on gold.
3. Bronze medals, used only to separate nations level on gold and silver.
4. Total medals — shown in a column, but not part of the sort at all.

The consequence catches people out constantly. A nation with three golds and nothing else finishes above a nation with two golds and eleven silvers, even though the second nation has more than four times the hardware. One gold outranks any number of silvers. That is the rule, applied without exception.

Worked illustration only. These are not real nations and not real counts — they exist purely to show how the sort behaves.

Ties, Shared Ranks and the “Per Capita” Tables

When gold, silver and bronze are all identical, the official table gives both nations the same rank and lists them alphabetically by country code. It does not invent a tie-break. Some broadcasters quietly re-sort by total medals to make their graphic look tidier, which is one of the more common reasons a television table and the official table disagree at a glance.

You will also see alternative tables circulating — medals per million people, medals per athlete sent, weighted point systems that score gold as three and bronze as one. These are interesting, and none of them are official. They are journalism and fan analysis, not the Games record. If someone shows you a table where India or any other nation sits in a surprising position, the first question is always: which table is this, and who built it?

Glasgow 2026 Was a Deliberately Smaller Games

The 2026 edition was unusual and it matters for anyone reading the tally. After the original host withdrew, the Games were rescoped around Glasgow with a compact programme of ten sports and sixteen disciplines staged across a small cluster of existing venues, with para events integrated into the same schedule rather than run separately. In total 215 medal events were contested — a figure that explains why the winning gold count was far lower than at recent editions.

The programme centred on athletics, swimming, artistic gymnastics, track cycling, netball, weightlifting, boxing, judo, bowls and 3x3 basketball. Several sports that appeared at recent editions — including a number in which India has historically been strong — are not on the Glasgow list. That single fact reshapes what any nation’s realistic medal profile looks like, and it is the biggest reason comparisons with previous Games are not like-for-like.

Two absences catch Indian readers out in particular: hockey and squash are not on the Glasgow 2026 programme. Gymnastics is, and so are weightlifting and boxing. If a graphic reaches you showing an India hockey or squash fixture at these Games, treat it as recycled from a previous edition rather than as news.

Because programmes and event lists can still be adjusted, treat any sport list — including ours — as indicative and confirm the final version on the official Commonwealth Sport website. We go through what the reduced programme means for the Indian contingent, sport by sport, in our companion guide to India’s events and schedule at Glasgow 2026.

Why Fewer Sports Changes the Arithmetic

A medal table is a function of the event list. Remove a discipline and you remove every medal in it, which affects nations unevenly. Countries whose strength is concentrated in one or two sports feel a cut far more sharply than countries with broad depth across athletics and swimming, the two largest medal pools at any Commonwealth Games.

This is worth internalising before you look at any 2026 table and compare it to 2022 or 2018. A different number of golds available, distributed across a different set of sports, produces a different-looking table for reasons that have nothing to do with any team performing better or worse. Comparing raw totals across editions with different programmes is one of the most common analytical mistakes in sports coverage.

Where the Official Live Tally Is Published

There is one board that settles arguments, and it is the one run by the Games organisers themselves. Commonwealth Sport publishes the official results and medal standings on its own platform, updated as each medal ceremony is completed. Accredited broadcasters carry a mirrored feed. Everything else — aggregator sites, news round-ups, the graphic in your group chat — is a copy of a copy with a delay attached.

• Official results platform — Commonwealth Sport’s own site, the authoritative version.
• Accredited broadcaster — the rights-holding broadcaster in your country, generally close to live.
• Major news wires — reliable but published in batches rather than continuously.
• Aggregators and social graphics — fastest to appear, slowest to be right, and never worth quoting.

For general background on the Games themselves — the history, the participating nations, the previous editions — the Commonwealth Games entry on Wikipedia is a decent starting point, though for anything live it is always behind the official feed.

Why Two Sites Show Different Numbers Right Now

This is the single most common complaint during any major Games, and there are four boring explanations:

1. Caching. Most high-traffic pages cache their tally for anything from thirty seconds to ten minutes to survive the load.
2. Award timing. Some sites add a medal when the final finishes; the official board adds it when the result is confirmed and the ceremony completed.
3. Reviews and protests. Results in judged and photo-finish events can be revised. Revisions propagate to the official board first.
4. Straight copying. A surprising share of “live” tally pages are scraping another site, so an error in one becomes an error in twenty.

The refresh habits that actually work — and the reason unofficial boards lag in a predictable way — are covered in our short guide to following live results without getting misled.

India at the Commonwealth Games: The Honest Context

India has competed at the Commonwealth Games since 1934 and has hosted them once, in Delhi in 2010. Its strongest historical returns have come from a fairly narrow set of disciplines rather than from across the board — weightlifting, wrestling, shooting, badminton, table tennis and boxing have carried a large share of the medals across recent editions.

With a reduced programme in 2026, several of those pillars are simply not on the schedule. Weightlifting and boxing remain, athletics and judo are on the programme, and India has a genuine recent history in bowls that surprises people who only follow the headline sports. What that produces on the table is not something we are going to guess at, and neither should anyone else.

The one Indian name that comes up more than any other when weightlifting is on the programme is Mirabai Chanu. Her career — an Olympic medal, a world title, and Commonwealth golds in two different editions — is all historical and all verifiable, and we set it out in our profile of Mirabai Chanu and her weightlifting category.

Reading a Medal Table Like Someone Who Knows

Glasgow 2026 is settled, but these habits apply to every Games and are worth carrying into the next one:

• Check how many golds are still available. A table at the halfway point of a Games is a snapshot of an unfinished process, not a result — as the mid-Games version of this very page said before the final figures existed.
• Look at which sports are still to come. Late-programme athletics and boxing finals moved this table substantially — India’s seven boxing golds landed in the closing days.
• Ignore total-medal arguments. The official order does not use totals, so an argument based on totals is arguing with a different table.
• Note the timestamp. Any tally without a “last updated” time should be treated as unknown age.
• Never quote a social media graphic. Especially one with a broadcaster logo on it, which is trivially faked.

A Note on Predictions — Including Ours

You will see a great deal of “India to win X medals” content around any Games. Some of it is reasonable journalism. A meaningful chunk of it exists to attach a betting product to a sporting event.

Dhani Win publishes none of it. We do not run odds, we do not publish medal forecasts, and we do not offer predictions on any sporting outcome. Our games are games of chance — the outcome of a Wingo round has no relationship to a weightlifting final, and no strategy, lucky number or system changes the odds of anything. That is worth stating plainly because a lot of sites in this space imply otherwise.

The same principle applies to our cricket coverage — our profile of the all-rounder Suryansh Shedge carries no scores and no tips, and our lottery coverage, including the Kerala SM-65 draw-code explainer, never publishes a winning number. Same rule everywhere: explain the system, point at the official source, do not invent the data.

Between Sessions

A Games schedule has long gaps — heats in the morning, finals in the evening, and hours of nothing in between if your sport is not on. If you fill some of that with a quick game, keep the two things separate in your head. Our guide to quick games during a sports break covers how to fit a round into a gap without letting it take over the evening, and the same rules apply here.

Play Responsibly

Dhani Win games are games of chance played with real money, and they are for adults aged 18 and over only. Set a budget before you open the app, treat it as the cost of entertainment, and never chase a loss. Nothing on this page is a prediction of any sporting result, and no game here is connected to one. If play stops feeling like fun, read about the warning signs of problem gambling and visit our responsible gaming page. Strictly 18+.

FAQ

Final Word

The medal tally is a simple object once you know the sort order: golds decide it, silvers and bronzes break ties, and totals are decoration. Glasgow 2026 adds one extra layer, because a smaller programme means the table is being built from a different set of events than the last edition you remember. Read the official board, note the timestamp, ignore the screenshots, and enjoy the sport for what it is. If you want a quick round in a gap between sessions, the Dhani Win colour prediction game is there — with a limit you decided in advance, and no connection whatsoever to what happens in Glasgow.